|
|
|
Many of these 'capital at risk' products were
fundamentally flawed. They were 'Income Bonds' that took greater risks
with 'gearing' and only became known as 'Precipice Bonds' when they
failed, every financial instrument has the capacity to fail but some are
riskier than others.
Who is responsible?
Was it the advisers or the manufacurers, or someone else?
 | These products used 'Derivatives'. |
 | The FSA described them as 'toxic' |
 | The FSA did nothing. |
 | The FSA actually approved the products. |
Where can you turn?
It all depends on:
 | The product. |
 | The literature. |
 | The manufacturer. |
 | The bank 'supporting' the 'guarantee'. |
 | The date of purchase. |
 | Other things. |
More to follow. |
|
|
Lost a packet?
Don't get angry, get even. |
| |
|